Risk-based regulation: what it is and why it matters?
The Code is a key tool for governments to achieve public policy
goals, such as ensuring environmental protection, public health and safety ،
Promoting fair competition, and increasing social well-being. However, the code
also comes with costs and challenges, such as burdening businesses and
consumers, and creating unannounced results.
And proper resources
and capabilities are needed for implementation and implementation. How can
governments design and provide regulation in a way that maximizes its benefits
and minimizes its costs? A possible response is a risk-based code.
Risk-based regulation is an approach that focuses on the results of the regulation rather than specific principles and practices. For this, regulators are required to identify, evaluate, assess, and identify risks associated with various regular activities using purpose and data-driven methods ، Prefer and manage them. Regulators have also been asked to choose the most appropriate and proportionate regulatory tools and strategies to address threats ، Considering the costs and benefits of different options.
The risk-based code is not all the solution that fits the
same size. This can be applied to different stages of the regulatory policy
cycle, such as agenda setting, policy design, implementation, implementation,
evaluation, and review.
It can also be applied to various regulatory domains, such
as environmental protection, consumer protection, financial stability,
occupational health and safety, etc. However, risk-based regulations do not
mean that all risks should be regularized or eliminated. Rather, it shows that
regulators should make informed and transparent decisions about how they are at
risk of regularizing and managing them.
There are risk-based regulations as they can help improve the
effectiveness and efficiency of the regulation. Using risk analysis and
evidence-based decision-making ، Regulators can better understand the nature
and extent of the risks they face, as well as the potential impact of various
regulatory powers. This can help them better allocate their resources as much
as possible and more clearly target their interventions. Using risk ratio and
results orientation, regulators can also reduce unnecessary or excessive
regulatory burdens on businesses and consumers ، While ensuring that the
required public results are achieved.
Regulators can communicate more clearly about the rationale
and objectives of their regulatory measures, as well as trade relations and
uncertainty. This can help build trust and trust between the public and
regulated institutions, as well as promote a culture of compliance and
cooperation.
Implementation of risk-based regulations requires not only
technical competence but also principle decision-making 1. Regulators need to
choose what decision-making rules apply when evaluating and managing Risk 2.
For example, they can adopt a precautionary principle when
dealing with uncertain or irreversible hazards۔ The principle of cost-benefit
when dealing with price-worthy or comparable hazards; or the principle of
justice when dealing with distribution or moral hazards.
Risk-based regulation is not just a technical enterprise۔ It
is also standard and strategic. This requires not only analytical skills but
also moral values۔ Not only experimental evidence but also stakeholder
participation۔ Not only scientific knowledge but also practical wisdom.